H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Aryna Sabalenka vs Kristyna Pliskova H2H: 0-1
Kristyna Pliskova holds a 1–0 lead over Aryna Sabalenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristyna Pliskova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristyna Pliskova won the 2020 Shenzhen fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 28
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2020* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-4 6-4 | Aryna Sabalenka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | #1 | #1 | 12,420 | 2,323 | 399 | 138 | 74.3% | 4 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 |
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Kristyna Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #96 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,936 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 28–9 | 75.7% | #10 | 2,005 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #2 | 1,986 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #5 | 1,956 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,170 | 3 | 17 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #1 | 2,225 | 4 | 21 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 36–6 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 24 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |