H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ashleigh Barty vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 1-0

Ashleigh Barty holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2013 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ashleigh Barty
AUS Age 30 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ashleigh Barty #183 7-5 2-6 6-1 Lucie Hradecka #87 Match data May 29, 2013* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ashleigh Barty #1 #1 10,185 2,180 197 72 73.2% 3 3 2 5 2 15
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ashleigh Barty Lucie Hradecka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2012 0–4 0.0% #175 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2013 4–5 44.4% #190 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 1–6 14.3% #223 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2016 2–1 66.7% #272 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2017 30–14 68.2% #17 1,891 0 1 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0
22 2018 42–19 68.9% #15 1,973 0 3 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0
23 2019 52–12 81.2% #1 2,082 1 7 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0
24 2020 12–3 80.0% #1 2,083 1 8 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0
25 2021 43–8 84.3% #1 2,117 2 13 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0
26 2022 11–0 100.0% #1 2,180 3 15 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ashleigh Barty Lucie Hradecka
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 22 9 31 71.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2018 25 11 36 69.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2019 33 9 42 78.6% 11 2 13 84.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2020 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2021 22 4 26 84.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2022 11 0 11 100.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 46 175 73.7% 35 17 52 67.3% 33 9 42 78.6% — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 243/269 of Ashleigh Barty's and 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ashleigh Barty Lucie Hradecka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2012 4/4 2.8 5.3 58.7% 60.8% 32.7% 35.0% 43.3% 49.0% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 6/9 3.5 2.7 54.3% 65.7% 50.2% 36.3% 44.9% 58.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 4/7 3.0 3.8 57.5% 63.1% 50.5% 57.1% 56.5% 57.6% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 3/3 6.7 3.7 65.2% 73.9% 47.4% 68.3% 35.5% 64.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 41/44 5.0 2.9 60.9% 72.5% 50.3% 58.9% 51.7% 63.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2018 58/61 4.9 2.9 58.4% 71.9% 53.7% 53.1% 47.3% 64.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2019 54/64 6.5 3.2 57.5% 73.7% 52.1% 54.7% 47.4% 64.4% 45.3% 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6%
24 2020 14/15 5.6 1.9 60.7% 73.5% 49.9% 60.4% 53.0% 64.4% 44.0% 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9%
25 2021 48/51 6.7 3.3 58.8% 75.8% 49.4% 59.3% 48.7% 64.8% 46.0% 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8%
26 2022 11/11 7.0 1.7 60.3% 81.1% 58.6% 90.0% 60.2% 72.2% 48.2% 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3%
Career — 243/269 5.7 3.0 58.9% 73.2% 51.4% 57.3% 49.1% 64.2% 44.0% — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ashleigh Barty Lucie Hradecka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2012 1469 97.5 -1.40 -1.92 0.627 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 1519 110.4 +0.25 -1.62 0.902 47.5% +1 — — 47.6% -1.05 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1510 114.8 +1.59 -1.59 0.772 46.2% +7 — — 23.1% -2.15 0–1 0–1 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 1595 108.1 -0.11 +1.91 1.241 53.2% — — +26 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–2 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 1892 150.0 +6.11 +1.57 1.211 54.0% -27 -297 -172 61.4% +1.02 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 111.0 -1.16 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06
22 2018 1973 151.5 +6.83 +0.72 1.194 53.1% -6 -281 -148 65.4% +1.08 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 108.4 -0.44 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
23 2019 2083 165.1 +6.89 +3.36 1.272 54.6% +1 -186 -124 71.9% +1.58 19–6 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 107.5 -1.06 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
24 2020 2084 154.1 +5.09 +2.45 1.236 54.3% -5 — — 67.6% +1.59 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 -0.69 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41
25 2021 2118 162.9 +7.48 +3.74 1.306 55.3% +19 -82 +83 77.0% +1.89 14–3 (82%) 7–4 (64%) 110.2 -0.67 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10
26 2022 2181 159.7 +8.99 +4.21 1.735 59.8% +42 — — 95.7% +3.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.08 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
Career — 2181 161.7 +6.38 +2.18 1.228 53.9% -1 -180 -96 67.3% +1.27 62–22 (74%) 29–22 (57%) 115.6 -2.03 — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.