H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Ashlyn Krueger vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 0-2
Magdalena Frech holds a 2–0 lead over Ashlyn Krueger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2024 Guadalajara fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2024* | Guadalajara | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Ashlyn Krueger | Match data |
| May 9, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Ashlyn Krueger | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2023 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Ashlyn Krueger | 6-2 6-0 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashlyn Krueger | #66 | #29 | 1,544 | 1,877 | 54 | 69 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashlyn Krueger | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #64 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #44 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |