H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Astra Sharma vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 0-1
Rebecca Peterson holds a 1–0 lead over Astra Sharma in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Peterson won the 2022 Melbourne 2 third round 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 30
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2022* | Melbourne 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Astra Sharma | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2021 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Rebecca Peterson | 7-5 6-3 | Astra Sharma | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Astra Sharma | #401 | #84 | 806 | 1,669 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rebecca Peterson | #573 | #43 | 1,332 | 1,863 | 79 | 93 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Astra Sharma | Rebecca Peterson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #112 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #55 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #234 | 1,486 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #235 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,516 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |