H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbara Jordan vs Anna Maria Fernandez H2H: 2-0
Barbara Jordan holds a 2–0 lead over Anna Maria Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Jordan leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Jordan won the 1985 Indianapolis 2 third round 2-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1985* | Indianapolis 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Jordan | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1980* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Jordan | 7-5 6-1 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Jordan | — | — | — | 1,711 | 62 | 100 | 38.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbara Jordan | Anna Maria Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1974 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1977 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1978 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,658 | 1 | 1 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,690 | 1 | 1 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,641 | 1 | 1 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,618 | 1 | 1 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,536 | 1 | 1 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,524 | 1 | 1 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,490 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |