H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Ana Bogdan H2H: 0-1
Ana Bogdan holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Bogdan won the 2021 Istanbul fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 6-3 6-3 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2020 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 6-4 6-4 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |