H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 2-1
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–1 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2022 Tallinn final 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2022* | Tallinn | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-3 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 0-6 6-4 7-6(12) | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Nov 10, 2021 | Guadalajara Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 6-4 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 166 | 101 | 62.2% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #32 | 1,933 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |