H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 0-2
Ashleigh Barty holds a 2–0 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2021 Cincinnati quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-2 6-4 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Jul 6, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 7-5 6-3 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |