H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2022 Wimbledon first round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Barbora Krejcikova | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbora Krejcikova | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |