H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Sesil Karatantcheva H2H: 0-1
Sesil Karatantcheva holds a 1–0 lead over Barbora Krejcikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sesil Karatantcheva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sesil Karatantcheva won the 2015 Quebec City third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2015* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sesil Karatantcheva | 6-3 7-5 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 168 | 101 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Sesil Karatantcheva | #1,329 | #35 | 919 | 1,727 | 50 | 75 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Sesil Karatantcheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #133 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #140 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,954 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |