H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Xiyu Wang H2H: 2-1
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–1 lead over Xiyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2023 Madrid third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 25
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2023* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-4 6-1 | Xiyu Wang | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2022* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Xiyu Wang | 6-1 7-6(1) | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-3 | Xiyu Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 166 | 101 | 62.2% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Xiyu Wang | #89 | #49 | 1,199 | 1,776 | 66 | 88 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Xiyu Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #209 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #50 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2026 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #89 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #32 | 1,933 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |