H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Barbora Strycova vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 2-0
Barbora Strycova holds a 2–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2023 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2023* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Barbora Strycova | 6-1 7-5 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
| May 11, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Barbora Strycova | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbora Strycova | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |