H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Barbora Strycova vs Monica Niculescu H2H: 3-2

Barbora Strycova holds a 3–2 lead over Monica Niculescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Barbora Strycova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Monica Niculescu won the 2016 US Open first round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1.

CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Monica Niculescu #58 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 Barbora Strycova #21 Match data
Jun 17, 2015* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Barbora Strycova #28 6-2 3-6 6-2 Monica Niculescu #49 Match data
Aug 28, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Barbora Strycova #29 4-6 6-4 6-2 Monica Niculescu #68 Match data
Mar 18, 2014* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Barbora Strycova #64 6-3 6-4 Monica Niculescu #70 Match data
Jun 21, 2012* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Monica Niculescu #31 7-6(6) 6-3 Barbora Strycova #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 286 297 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Barbora Strycova Monica Niculescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 2004 14–15 48.3% #57 1,562 0 0
19 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,490 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0
20 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,477 0 0 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0
21 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,456 0 0 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0
22 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0
23 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,524 0 0 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0
24 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0
25 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1
26 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2
27 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,584 0 1 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2
28 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3
29 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3
30 2016 35–23 60.3% #20 1,791 0 1 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,868 0 2 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2018 23–22 51.1% #33 1,765 0 2 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,713 0 2 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3
34 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
37 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,602 0 2