H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2022 Nottingham final 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2022 | Nottingham | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Alison Riske-Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |