H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 0-2
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2023 San Diego quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2023* | San Diego | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-4 6-3 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2022* | Tallinn | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-3 6-4 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 |