H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Heather Watson H2H: 2-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 2–0 lead over Heather Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2018 Miami first round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2026 | Queens | WTA 500 | Q2 | Grass | Heather Watson | 7-5 6-0 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Heather Watson | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2018 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Heather Watson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Heather Watson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |