H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Heather Watson H2H: 2-0

Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 2–0 lead over Heather Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2018 Miami Open first round 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beatriz Haddad Maia
Brazil Age 30 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Heather Watson
Great Britain Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Watson #327 7-5 6-0 Beatriz Haddad Maia #105 Match data Jun 6, 2026 Q1 Q Queen's Club Championships WTA 500 Grass
Beatriz Haddad Maia #64 7-6(3) 6-2 Heather Watson #72 Match data Mar 22, 2018* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Beatriz Haddad Maia #60 7-5 4-6 6-1 Heather Watson #71 Match data Feb 27, 2018 R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beatriz Haddad Maia #154 #10 3,194 1,939 148 136 52.1% 0 0 1 1 2 4
Heather Watson #446 #38 1,386 1,755 146 199 42.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Heather Watson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 1–1 50.0% #299 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #239 1,475 0 0 2010 1–5 16.7% #176 1,472 0 0
19 2015 3–2 60.0% #246 1,508 0 0 2011 10–11 47.6% #92 1,536 0 0
20 2016 0–3 0.0% #174 1,459 0 0 2012 18–17 51.4% #49 1,693 0 1
21 2017 14–12 53.8% #71 1,658 0 0 2013 9–16 36.0% #121 1,549 0 1
22 2018 5–9 35.7% #183 1,579 0 0 2014 9–17 34.6% #49 1,540 0 1
23 2019 7–5 58.3% #121 1,671 0 0 2015 18–19 48.6% #55 1,610 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 2016 16–19 45.7% #76 1,586 0 3
25 2021 2–2 50.0% #83 1,635 0 0 2017 13–15 46.4% #73 1,613 0 3
26 2022 34–21 61.8% #15 1,829 0 2 2018 10–17 37.0% #91 1,574 0 3
27 2023 32–21 60.4% #11 1,894 0 3 2019 5–9 35.7% #103 1,624 0 3
28 2024 34–25 57.6% #17 1,889 0 4 2020 9–8 52.9% #58 1,663 0 4
29 2025 16–22 42.1% #58 1,768 0 4 2021 7–17 29.2% #72 1,577 0 4
30 2026 0–11 0.0% #154 1,536 0 4 2022 9–12 42.9% #139 1,568 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2023 8–7 53.3% #137 1,595 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2024 3–6 33.3% #162 1,569 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2025 1–3 25.0% #269 1,544 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #446 1,595 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Heather Watson
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2015 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
21 2017 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2019 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 11 24 54.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
26 2022 19 16 35 54.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 2018 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2023 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2019 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 2024 24 16 40 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2021 3 12 15 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2026 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 88 176 50.0% 34 32 66 51.5% 26 16 42 61.9% — 94 122 216 43.5% 11 27 38 28.9% 41 50 91 45.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 267/284 of Beatriz Haddad Maia's and 324/345 of Heather Watson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Heather Watson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 2/2 1.5 2.0 67.4% 65.8% 49.0% 81.8% 62.7% 60.5% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 1.0 2.5 67.9% 54.9% 17.6% 48.8% 31.3% 43.0% 37.4% 2010 6/6 2.7 3.2 62.5% 58.2% 41.9% 44.7% 30.6% 52.2% 40.1%
19 2015 5/5 3.4 1.8 59.9% 67.9% 55.8% 51.8% 41.6% 62.9% 50.2% 2011 21/21 3.2 2.8 65.7% 63.2% 45.6% 56.1% 47.7% 57.3% 44.0%
20 2016 3/3 1.3 7.3 58.4% 58.0% 29.2% 44.6% 40.3% 45.7% 36.2% 2012 30/35 2.8 2.9 65.0% 63.4% 43.8% 48.6% 46.6% 56.4% 42.9%
21 2017 26/26 1.6 3.6 68.1% 65.7% 47.9% 57.3% 43.6% 60.1% 42.2% 2013 25/25 3.6 3.1 62.5% 63.2% 47.0% 52.4% 47.4% 57.0% 40.8%
22 2018 14/14 1.7 4.2 65.1% 63.5% 40.5% 38.9% 52.0% 55.5% 40.0% 2014 24/26 2.9 3.4 59.3% 60.0% 42.1% 43.9% 51.4% 52.0% 40.8%
23 2019 12/12 2.1 4.9 72.9% 65.6% 47.3% 68.8% 38.1% 60.3% 42.3% 2015 31/37 3.5 3.5 58.9% 64.6% 48.5% 54.7% 52.9% 58.0% 42.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 33/35 4.2 3.8 58.5% 65.2% 46.2% 57.8% 51.6% 57.3% 45.0%
25 2021 4/4 1.5 2.5 62.1% 57.5% 39.1% 50.8% 48.2% 50.3% 44.4% 2017 27/28 3.5 4.9 58.6% 66.8% 45.4% 61.4% 49.9% 57.8% 43.0%
26 2022 51/55 2.9 4.1 64.9% 67.4% 46.8% 57.2% 43.8% 60.3% 41.5% 2018 26/27 4.1 3.4 59.5% 64.9% 43.9% 49.2% 45.6% 56.4% 42.8%
27 2023 52/53 2.2 2.9 69.4% 63.5% 49.6% 54.2% 45.7% 59.4% 42.7% 2019 14/14 3.4 3.4 57.0% 63.2% 43.4% 56.7% 37.8% 54.7% 40.9%
28 2024 57/59 2.2 3.4 64.0% 66.5% 47.2% 56.4% 50.9% 59.4% 43.3% 2020 17/17 4.1 3.2 57.0% 64.4% 43.9% 52.1% 53.4% 55.8% 42.0%
29 2025 28/38 2.2 5.0 64.6% 62.1% 43.4% 51.9% 39.3% 55.3% 41.1% 2021 23/24 5.4 4.1 56.3% 67.6% 41.7% 58.4% 46.4% 56.4% 37.2%
30 2026 11/11 0.9 5.5 63.2% 56.8% 30.5% 41.9% 35.3% 47.5% 38.7% 2022 20/21 2.9 2.1 62.3% 63.2% 44.4% 52.4% 51.3% 56.1% 40.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 15/15 3.2 3.5 59.7% 65.9% 42.0% 44.9% 38.1% 56.2% 42.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 9/9 2.2 3.4 55.4% 67.6% 44.0% 50.8% 52.4% 56.8% 39.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/4 2.5 2.5 51.4% 65.4% 41.1% 35.0% 39.6% 53.7% 43.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 0.0 4.0 48.5% 68.8% 23.5% 57.1% 33.3% 45.5% 37.9%
Career — 267/284 2.2 3.8 66.0% 64.7% 45.9% 54.6% 45.1% 58.2% 42.1% — 324/345 3.5 3.4 60.0% 64.3% 44.6% 52.9% 48.0% 56.3% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Heather Watson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1501 105.4 -1.64 -0.18 1.211 55.0% — — — 60.0% +1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1475 92.2 -4.60 -4.21 0.656 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.07 2010 1473 98.6 -0.96 -1.56 0.838 46.2% — — +99 23.1% -1.38 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
19 2015 1509 112.3 +3.07 +1.80 1.352 55.7% — +60 — 66.7% +1.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.11 2011 1537 115.9 +1.02 -0.72 1.031 51.0% +26 -23 +9 51.1% +0.30 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 +1.09
20 2016 1460 88.8 -3.89 -3.72 0.667 40.8% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.37 2012 1693 127.7 +0.47 +0.10 0.984 49.6% -34 -139 -55 51.3% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -0.84
21 2017 1658 123.3 +3.22 -1.30 1.058 51.2% -37 -29 -31 55.0% +0.32 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 95.7 -0.58 2013 1550 109.0 +0.35 -2.61 0.948 49.1% -5 — +30 38.3% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 94.6 +0.15
22 2018 1579 120.0 -0.85 -2.40 0.899 47.7% +10 — — 41.4% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.26 2014 1540 121.1 -2.65 -1.65 0.851 46.8% -40 — +96 36.1% -0.87 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39
23 2019 1672 123.2 +2.60 -1.74 1.063 51.7% -10 -26 — 58.6% +0.72 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.0 0.00 2015 1610 129.5 -0.01 +1.12 1.008 50.4% -15 -87 +77 50.6% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 2–7 (22%) 96.0 -0.01
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1586 126.9 +0.96 +0.88 1.053 51.0% +27 -56 +28 48.2% +0.12 8–9 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.97
25 2021 1635 117.7 -2.24 +2.12 0.893 47.8% +29 — — 55.6% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2017 1614 124.1 +1.17 -0.04 1.019 50.6% -57 — +98 49.2% +0.29 5–6 (45%) 2–7 (22%) 95.1 -1.23
26 2022 1830 142.7 +2.95 -0.63 1.044 50.8% -55 -59 +126 53.6% +0.22 16–7 (70%) 9–2 (82%) 112.2 +0.02 2018 1574 120.5 -0.38 -0.79 0.981 49.7% +4 -55 +92 41.9% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 93.2 +0.66
27 2023 1895 151.9 +3.13 +0.69 1.052 50.8% -30 +20 +20 55.7% +0.41 16–8 (67%) 15–11 (58%) 107.1 -0.54 2019 1625 117.3 -0.69 -1.28 0.902 47.8% 0 — -17 38.7% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.18
28 2024 1889 148.0 +2.61 +0.61 1.067 51.4% +4 -23 +13 57.3% +0.50 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 +1.85 2020 1664 126.5 -0.35 +0.15 0.950 49.1% +30 — — 51.2% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.7 -0.02
29 2025 1768 129.5 -1.12 -1.17 0.918 48.1% -32 +50 +113 44.6% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 95.9 +1.81 2021 1578 117.2 -0.31 -3.41 0.854 47.3% +6 — +45 33.3% -0.80 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 99.6 +0.11
30 2026 1536 108.1 -5.44 -3.77 0.737 43.0% +44 +132 — 15.4% -2.46 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.26 2022 1568 107.0 -0.88 -1.99 0.920 48.4% +3 -155 +83 39.6% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 3–7 (30%) 101.5 +1.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1596 115.3 -0.40 -1.06 0.971 49.4% -14 — +129 50.0% -0.09 3–1 (75%) 4–0 (100%) 105.8 +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1569 118.9 -0.40 -1.74 0.904 47.8% +24 — +120 35.0% -0.65 1–1 0–1 — +0.23
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1544 104.7 -1.18 +1.77 0.937 48.3% — — +113 33.3% -0.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.02
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1595 109.3 -0.18 -2.54 0.695 41.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
Career — 1939 140.7 +1.71 -0.47 1.009 50.1% -20 +8 +75 51.2% +0.07 56–52 (52%) 47–38 (55%) 101.6 +1.23 — 1755 124.6 -0.08 -0.77 0.959 49.3% -6 -84 +58 44.2% -0.28 57–70 (45%) 43–60 (42%) 92.9 +0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.