H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2015 Bogotá Open second round 7-6(5) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beatriz Haddad Maia
Brazil Age 30 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #120 7-6(5) 6-0 Beatriz Haddad Maia #190 Match data Apr 17, 2015* R16 Bogotá Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beatriz Haddad Maia #154 #10 3,194 1,939 148 136 52.1% 0 0 1 1 2 4
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 1–1 50.0% #299 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #239 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2015 3–2 60.0% #246 1,508 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2016 0–3 0.0% #174 1,459 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2017 14–12 53.8% #71 1,658 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2018 5–9 35.7% #183 1,579 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2019 7–5 58.3% #121 1,671 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2021 2–2 50.0% #83 1,635 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2022 34–21 61.8% #15 1,829 0 2 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2023 32–21 60.4% #11 1,894 0 3 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2024 34–25 57.6% #17 1,889 0 4 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2025 16–22 42.1% #58 1,768 0 4 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2026 0–11 0.0% #154 1,536 0 4 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2017 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2019 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2022 19 16 35 54.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2023 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2024 24 16 40 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2026 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 88 176 50.0% 34 32 66 51.5% 26 16 42 61.9% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1501 105.4 -1.64 -0.18 1.211 55.0% — — — 60.0% +1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1475 92.2 -4.60 -4.21 0.656 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1509 112.3 +3.07 +1.80 1.352 55.7% — +60 — 66.7% +1.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.11 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2016 1460 88.8 -3.89 -3.72 0.667 40.8% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.37 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2017 1658 123.3 +3.22 -1.30 1.058 51.2% -37 -29 -31 55.0% +0.32 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 95.7 -0.58 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2018 1579 120.0 -0.85 -2.40 0.899 47.7% +10 — — 41.4% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.26 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2019 1672 123.2 +2.60 -1.74 1.063 51.7% -10 -26 — 58.6% +0.72 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.0 0.00 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2021 1635 117.7 -2.24 +2.12 0.893 47.8% +29 — — 55.6% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2022 1830 142.7 +2.95 -0.63 1.044 50.8% -55 -59 +126 53.6% +0.22 16–7 (70%) 9–2 (82%) 112.2 +0.02 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2023 1895 151.9 +3.13 +0.69 1.052 50.8% -30 +20 +20 55.7% +0.41 16–8 (67%) 15–11 (58%) 107.1 -0.54 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2024 1889 148.0 +2.61 +0.61 1.067 51.4% +4 -23 +13 57.3% +0.50 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 +1.85 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2025 1769 129.5 -1.12 -1.17 0.918 48.1% -33 +49 +112 44.6% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 95.9 +1.80 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2026 1537 108.1 -5.46 -3.73 0.737 43.0% +43 +131 — 15.4% -2.46 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.23 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1939 140.7 +1.71 -0.47 1.009 50.1% -20 +7 +75 51.2% +0.07 56–52 (52%) 47–38 (55%) 101.6 +1.22 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.