H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Maria Sakkari H2H: 4-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 4–0 lead over Maria Sakkari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2025 US Open third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-1 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| May 1, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-4 6-4 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2022* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 259 | 205 | 55.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |