H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Belinda Bencic vs Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova H2H: 4-2

Belinda Bencic holds a 4–2 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2020 Dubai third round 1-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Belinda Bencic
SUI Age 29 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2020* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 1-6 6-1 6-1 Belinda Bencic #4 Match data
Oct 20, 2019 Moscow WTA 500 F Hard Belinda Bencic #10 3-6 6-1 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #40 Match data
Jul 3, 2019* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Belinda Bencic #13 6-2 6-3 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #46 Match data
Feb 13, 2016* St. Petersburg WTA 500 QF Hard Belinda Bencic #11 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #26 Match data
Aug 7, 2015* Washington WTA 500 R16 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #40 6-2 6-4 Belinda Bencic #22 Match data
May 14, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Belinda Bencic #96 6-3 3-6 6-3 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Belinda Bencic #14 #4 4,745 2,032 298 187 61.4% 0 2 0 7 0 9
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Bencic Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2012 0–1 0.0% #612 1,498 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2013 2–3 40.0% #184 1,512 0 0 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2014 18–17 51.4% #32 1,697 0 0 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0
18 2015 40–21 65.6% #14 1,886 0 2 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2
19 2016 17–20 45.9% #43 1,687 0 2 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3
20 2017 3–8 27.3% #98 1,686 0 2 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3
21 2018 12–13 48.0% #54 1,723 0 2 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5
22 2019 48–21 69.6% #8 1,923 0 4 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7
23 2020 7–7 50.0% #12 1,850 0 4 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8
24 2021 28–19 59.6% #23 1,848 0 4 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8
25 2022 38–19 66.7% #12 1,884 0 5 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11
26 2023 31–13 70.5% #17 1,921 0 7 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12
27 — — — — — — — 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12
28 2025 36–16 69.2% #11 2,004 0 9 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12
29 2026 18–9 66.7% #14 1,998 0 9 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12
31 — — — — — — — 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12