H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Annika Beck H2H: 2-0
Belinda Bencic holds a 2–0 lead over Annika Beck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2016 Beijing second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 6-2 | Annika Beck | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2016* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Annika Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Annika Beck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |