H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Barbora Krejcikova: 1–1 excluding walkovers; 1–2 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Barbora Krejcikova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2022 Ostrava Open second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | (w/o) | Belinda Bencic | Match data | Oct 7, 2022* | R16 | Ostrava Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Barbora Krejcikova | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 6-2 | Belinda Bencic | Match data | Oct 1, 2022* | SF | Tallinn | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Belinda Bencic | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data | Jul 29, 2021* | R16 | Tokyo Olympics | Olympics | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #20 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,035 | 312 | 195 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #46 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,013 | 178 | 107 | 62.5% | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #43 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #5 | 1,942 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,909 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,906 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #10 | 1,896 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | 2026 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #65 | 1,902 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,876 | 2 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 30 | 12 | 42 | 71.4% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2020 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2021 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 24 | 10 | 34 | 70.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2022 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 28 | 2025 | 28 | 11 | 39 | 71.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2024 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 29 | 2026 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2025 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| Career | — | 205 | 131 | 336 | 61.0% | 53 | 39 | 92 | 57.6% | 54 | 25 | 79 | 68.4% | — | 109 | 65 | 174 | 62.6% | 39 | 29 | 68 | 57.4% | 30 | 13 | 43 | 69.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/511 of Belinda Bencic's and 265/285 of Barbora Krejcikova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2012 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 60.0% | 56.7% | 25.0% | 58.3% | 33.3% | 44.0% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 5/5 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 57.6% | 63.2% | 44.7% | 31.0% | 45.6% | 55.2% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 30/35 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 58.2% | 63.1% | 42.2% | 47.6% | 46.5% | 54.5% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 50/61 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 66.1% | 65.0% | 50.9% | 49.8% | 46.0% | 60.1% | 42.0% | 2014 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 69.1% | 64.0% | 38.7% | 62.3% | 62.5% | 56.4% | 47.6% |
| 19 | 2016 | 35/39 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 60.9% | 65.0% | 43.9% | 55.0% | 39.1% | 56.6% | 39.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 11/12 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 59.2% | 64.6% | 40.9% | 52.1% | 53.3% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 2016 | 7/7 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 60.3% | 65.0% | 42.6% | 61.7% | 46.6% | 55.6% | 42.1% |
| 21 | 2018 | 25/28 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 63.8% | 64.7% | 43.4% | 54.8% | 47.8% | 57.2% | 43.1% | 2017 | 9/10 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 60.2% | 64.5% | 41.8% | 58.0% | 36.3% | 55.4% | 46.9% |
| 22 | 2019 | 64/69 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 68.6% | 46.9% | 51.4% | 47.6% | 60.3% | 45.5% | 2018 | 4/4 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 49.7% | 60.1% | 43.0% | 45.7% | 42.1% | 51.0% | 45.4% |
| 23 | 2020 | 14/14 | 3.5 | 5.4 | 60.4% | 65.1% | 40.4% | 47.6% | 53.4% | 55.5% | 39.5% | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 77.5% | 60.2% | 47.2% | 68.5% | 55.0% | 57.4% | 48.5% |
| 24 | 2021 | 45/53 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 59.8% | 70.6% | 47.5% | 57.7% | 44.0% | 61.4% | 41.2% | 2020 | 14/14 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 67.2% | 41.3% | 52.9% | 43.0% | 57.9% | 45.1% |
| 25 | 2022 | 56/57 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 63.2% | 70.8% | 49.0% | 62.0% | 48.2% | 62.7% | 43.6% | 2021 | 57/60 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 59.1% | 70.1% | 50.2% | 60.5% | 50.6% | 62.0% | 45.0% |
| 26 | 2023 | 42/44 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 60.7% | 70.3% | 52.4% | 54.1% | 53.3% | 63.2% | 44.6% | 2022 | 40/41 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 59.9% | 70.3% | 47.5% | 57.0% | 51.0% | 61.1% | 45.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 48/50 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 59.8% | 69.9% | 46.8% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 60.6% | 44.3% |
| 28 | 2025 | 39/54 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 64.8% | 67.0% | 46.4% | 55.6% | 49.4% | 59.7% | 43.1% | 2024 | 32/37 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 63.0% | 68.6% | 45.2% | 55.9% | 47.8% | 60.1% | 42.5% |
| 29 | 2026 | 35/39 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 62.9% | 67.2% | 50.3% | 58.0% | 51.8% | 61.1% | 46.7% | 2025 | 22/26 | 3.2 | 5.5 | 59.6% | 67.2% | 44.4% | 53.5% | 53.0% | 58.0% | 44.1% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 27/31 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 61.5% | 69.2% | 47.2% | 56.6% | 47.6% | 60.8% | 44.6% |
| Career | — | 452/511 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 62.2% | 67.4% | 47.2% | 54.2% | 47.7% | 59.8% | 43.2% | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 60.6% | 68.8% | 46.6% | 56.4% | 49.2% | 60.0% | 44.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2012 | 1498 | 109.1 | +0.38 | +1.75 | 0.665 | 40.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 1512 | 112.4 | -1.40 | -1.46 | 0.993 | 49.7% | +35 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.08 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 1688 | 133.1 | -1.06 | +0.66 | 0.968 | 49.4% | -37 | -89 | -56 | 46.8% | -0.19 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–5 (17%) | 103.6 | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 1917 | 142.9 | +1.98 | +1.43 | 1.055 | 50.8% | -43 | -370 | -32 | 61.7% | +0.71 | 13–5 (72%) | 10–7 (59%) | 110.5 | +0.12 | 2014 | 1504 | 102.8 | -0.26 | +0.43 | 1.090 | 52.0% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1682 | 132.7 | +0.67 | -2.42 | 0.916 | 48.4% | +13 | — | +122 | 50.6% | +0.01 | 8–5 (62%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.39 | 2015 | 1489 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 20 | 2017 | 1685 | 116.5 | +0.34 | -2.98 | 0.868 | 47.5% | +4 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.56 | 2016 | 1508 | 113.7 | +0.66 | +0.02 | 0.949 | 49.1% | +26 | +26 | — | 38.9% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.80 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1720 | 131.9 | +0.41 | +0.77 | 1.005 | 50.1% | -15 | — | +137 | 50.8% | -0.14 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–3 (67%) | 98.4 | -0.88 | 2017 | 1564 | 115.5 | +0.38 | +1.03 | 1.052 | 51.1% | — | +111 | — | 47.4% | -0.05 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2019 | 1919 | 153.4 | +3.66 | +3.33 | 1.146 | 52.8% | +7 | -198 | -22 | 63.7% | +0.75 | 19–10 (66%) | 11–3 (79%) | 113.3 | -0.19 | 2018 | 1544 | 112.6 | -2.26 | +1.26 | 0.925 | 48.1% | -34 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1849 | 132.9 | -0.10 | -2.02 | 0.889 | 47.8% | +28 | — | — | 53.1% | -0.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–0 (100%) | 98.8 | +0.36 | 2019 | 1546 | 98.3 | -0.20 | +0.69 | 1.139 | 53.5% | — | +58 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1903 | 145.9 | +4.09 | -0.65 | 1.068 | 51.2% | +31 | -180 | +37 | 57.6% | +0.47 | 12–4 (75%) | 8–1 (89%) | 110.4 | +2.66 | 2020 | 1700 | 133.2 | +1.74 | +1.17 | 1.071 | 51.2% | -61 | -17 | — | 59.5% | +0.38 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–0 | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1908 | 149.1 | +4.85 | +1.47 | 1.169 | 52.9% | +16 | -43 | +29 | 63.2% | +0.93 | 16–10 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | 99.1 | -0.23 | 2021 | 1943 | 158.0 | +4.93 | +2.86 | 1.184 | 53.4% | -68 | +46 | -256 | 66.2% | +1.44 | 13–4 (76%) | 7–6 (54%) | 111.8 | -0.54 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1926 | 154.5 | +5.48 | +2.15 | 1.211 | 53.6% | +23 | -57 | +17 | 65.6% | +0.99 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–5 (64%) | 102.7 | +0.65 | 2022 | 1910 | 149.3 | +3.27 | +2.35 | 1.156 | 52.8% | +41 | -8 | -231 | 61.5% | +0.80 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–5 (62%) | 99.8 | +0.24 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1909 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1906 | 157.8 | +4.11 | +1.82 | 1.123 | 52.4% | +67 | -60 | -137 | 61.0% | +1.00 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–7 (30%) | 99.6 | +0.43 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2004 | 159.8 | +2.92 | +0.83 | 1.069 | 51.4% | +50 | -160 | +75 | 62.7% | +0.75 | 14–6 (70%) | 10–6 (63%) | 106.3 | -1.93 | 2024 | 1897 | 140.8 | +3.38 | -0.19 | 1.064 | 51.2% | +6 | -116 | +120 | 54.2% | +0.13 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–2 (83%) | 105.2 | -0.11 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1922 | 155.4 | +3.89 | +3.44 | 1.200 | 53.6% | +23 | -6 | +132 | 63.4% | +1.00 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | 94.7 | +1.05 | 2025 | 1902 | 138.7 | +1.22 | +0.87 | 1.050 | 50.8% | +32 | -157 | +132 | 55.9% | +0.32 | 10–1 (91%) | 4–1 (80%) | 110.6 | +0.47 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1876 | 137.9 | +2.57 | +1.56 | 1.138 | 52.7% | +6 | -93 | +166 | 64.1% | +1.09 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–6 (45%) | 94.8 | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 2036 | 153.3 | +2.80 | +1.04 | 1.074 | 51.4% | +11 | -132 | +30 | 58.7% | +0.52 | 110–70 (61%) | 79–48 (62%) | 111.1 | +0.15 | — | 2013 | 150.7 | +3.15 | +1.64 | 1.114 | 52.2% | +8 | -3 | +23 | 59.1% | +0.73 | 55–39 (59%) | 40–28 (59%) | 109.6 | +0.29 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronika Kudermetova | 7 | 4 | 11 | Aug 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 2 | 7 | 9 | Aug 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jul 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 26, 2025 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 11, 2024 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |