H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Diana Shnaider H2H: 3-0
Belinda Bencic holds a 3–0 lead over Diana Shnaider in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2026 Madrid third round 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 22
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Belinda Bencic | 6-2 7-6(6) | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 6-3 | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-4 6-4 | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Diana Shnaider | #18 | #12 | 3,108 | 1,965 | 104 | 72 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Diana Shnaider | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #93 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,942 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #21 | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #18 | 1,874 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |