H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Maria Sakkari H2H: 1-2
Maria Sakkari holds a 2–1 lead over Belinda Bencic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Maria Sakkari leads 1–0 on clay, while Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sakkari won the 2025 Rome first round 6-2 0-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Maria Sakkari | 6-2 (ret.) | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2022* | Berlin | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Belinda Bencic | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2020* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 259 | 205 | 55.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Maria Sakkari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 |