H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-2
Belinda Bencic and Mirjana Lucic-Baroni are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Acapulco third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 7-5 6-4 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2016 | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-6(6) 1-6 6-4 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2015* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | (w/o) | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2015* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 6-3 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |