H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Belinda Bencic vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–2 lead over Belinda Bencic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2019 Beijing third round 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Belinda Bencic
SUI Age 29 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 2019 Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Belinda Bencic #10 3-6 6-3 7-5 Venus Williams #59 Match data
Jan 17, 2018* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Belinda Bencic #78 6-3 7-5 Venus Williams #5 Match data
Sep 6, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #23 6-3 6-4 Belinda Bencic #12 Match data
Feb 19, 2015* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #11 6-1 6-2 Belinda Bencic #37 Match data
May 28, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Venus Williams #29 6-4 6-1 Belinda Bencic #80 Match data
Oct 18, 2012* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Venus Williams #41 6-3 6-1 Belinda Bencic #618 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Belinda Bencic #14 #4 4,745 2,032 298 187 61.4% 0 2 0 7 0 9
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Bencic Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2012 0–1 0.0% #612 1,498 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2013 2–3 40.0% #184 1,512 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2014 18–17 51.4% #32 1,697 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2015 40–21 65.6% #14 1,886 0 2 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2016 17–20 45.9% #43 1,687 0 2 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2017 3–8 27.3% #98 1,686 0 2 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2018 12–13 48.0% #54 1,723 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2019 48–21 69.6% #8 1,923 0 4 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2020 7–7 50.0% #12 1,850 0 4 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2021 28–19 59.6% #23 1,848 0 4 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2022 38–19 66.7% #12 1,884 0 5 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2023 31–13 70.5% #17 1,921 0 7 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2025 36–16 69.2% #11 2,004 0 9 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2026 18–9 66.7% #14 1,998 0 9 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47