H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bernarda Pera vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 1-0
Bernarda Pera holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bernarda Pera won the 2018 Charleston second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2018* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 6-2 6-2 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernarda Pera | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |