H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-2
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–1 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2018 Seoul third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 7-5 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2014* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 7-5 6-2 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-7(10) 6-4 6-2 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |