H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ana Konjuh

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ana Konjuh.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Ana Konjuh
Croatia Age 28 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #77 6-2 6-3 Ana Konjuh #79 Match data Feb 13, 2016 Q1 Q Dubai Tennis Championships Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ana Konjuh #647 #20 1,830 1,786 84 81 50.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Konjuh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 2014 8–6 57.1% #93 1,611 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2015 11–9 55.0% #82 1,656 0 1
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2016 19–14 57.6% #47 1,683 0 1
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 2017 22–18 55.0% #44 1,716 0 1
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 2018 1–3 25.0% #385 1,688 0 1
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #1282 1,645 0 1
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2021 17–14 54.8% #67 1,690 0 1
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 2022 6–13 31.6% #108 1,647 0 1
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 2023 0–2 0.0% #407 1,587 0 1
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,464 0 1
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Konjuh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 12 7 19 63.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2021 9 8 17 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 49 49 98 50.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 156/165 of Ana Konjuh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Konjuh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 14/14 5.4 5.8 53.2% 68.0% 43.3% 47.2% 39.0% 56.7% 40.4%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 17/20 3.2 3.8 58.4% 65.2% 50.4% 56.8% 59.7% 58.7% 44.3%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% 2016 28/33 3.9 5.1 53.6% 70.2% 45.2% 57.5% 47.1% 58.3% 43.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 40/40 3.6 4.7 57.7% 67.7% 44.6% 52.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 3.8 3.0 62.5% 57.0% 35.7% 58.3% 24.2% 48.3% 40.7%
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% 2019 1/1 3.0 8.0 42.6% 76.9% 42.9% 25.0% 0.0% 57.4% 27.9%
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% 2021 31/31 3.9 7.4 59.0% 62.8% 42.4% 54.1% 48.3% 54.4% 44.9%
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% 2022 18/19 4.5 5.7 57.5% 64.9% 39.5% 51.1% 36.4% 53.9% 39.7%
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% 2023 2/2 4.0 5.5 54.5% 67.3% 41.9% 67.7% 14.3% 55.7% 29.4%
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% 2025 1/1 0.0 8.0 42.6% 60.9% 48.4% 42.9% 33.3% 53.7% 36.4%
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 156/165 3.9 5.4 56.8% 66.3% 43.9% 53.7% 46.7% 56.5% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ana Konjuh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 2014 1611 123.8 +0.22 -1.66 0.933 48.3% -10 — +44 47.4% -0.24 8–2 (80%) 1–1 — -0.76
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 2015 1657 117.4 +0.42 +1.27 1.073 51.6% -67 -102 +82 52.3% +0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.20
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 2016 1684 123.8 +2.55 +0.13 1.047 51.1% +5 -132 -1 58.0% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 103.1 +1.16
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 2017 1716 135.7 +1.25 +0.51 1.028 50.5% -10 -157 +78 54.1% +0.13 9–6 (60%) 8–5 (62%) 104.6 -0.34
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 2018 1688 106.6 -1.09 +0.29 0.789 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 2019 1646 96.7 -2.44 -2.78 0.654 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75 2020 1622 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 2021 1691 127.3 -0.62 +0.89 0.985 49.7% +1 -22 — 52.8% +0.03 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.0 -0.51
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 2022 1647 126.6 -1.90 -1.85 0.861 46.8% +43 -54 — 36.4% -0.91 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -1.32
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 2023 1587 109.7 -2.35 -4.08 0.664 42.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2024 1554 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 2025 1465 98.2 +2.05 -0.61 0.785 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2026 1446 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 — 1786 128.7 +0.44 +0.04 0.982 49.6% -3 -88 +62 50.3% -0.09 35–23 (60%) 21–15 (58%) 109.5 -1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.