H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 1-1
Bethanie Mattek-Sands and Angelique Kerber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on grass, while Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 6-4 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2011* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 6-4 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |
| 38 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |