H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 0-3

Ekaterina Makarova holds a 3–0 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Makarova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2015 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix first round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ekaterina Makarova #8 6-4 7-6(3) Bethanie Mattek-Sands #182 Match data Apr 23, 2015* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Ekaterina Makarova #25 6-4 6-4 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #53 Match data Aug 29, 2013* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ekaterina Makarova #42 6-2 6-3 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #75 Match data Mar 9, 2012* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,942 252 225 52.8% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ekaterina Makarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,663 0 1
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,606 0 1
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,836 0 1
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,840 0 2
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,794 0 2
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 2016 27–21 56.2% #30 1,776 0 2
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,840 0 3
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,756 0 3
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,707 0 3
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ekaterina Makarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 14 20 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 17 12 29 58.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 30 15 45 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 18 9 27 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 21 14 35 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2018 12 13 25 48.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 165 149 314 52.5% 45 46 91 49.5% 42 28 70 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 442/477 of Ekaterina Makarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ekaterina Makarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 2.3 2.5 66.4% 54.5% 37.8% 48.4% 66.9% 48.3% 39.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/37 2.6 2.5 60.2% 62.5% 44.2% 40.5% 45.0% 55.1% 43.0%
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% 2009 39/41 2.2 4.0 58.6% 64.0% 40.9% 48.2% 50.2% 54.2% 43.9%
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% 2010 31/34 2.5 2.1 59.6% 59.5% 47.6% 57.5% 52.7% 54.8% 41.5%
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% 2011 36/38 2.5 2.4 60.5% 64.0% 43.2% 47.4% 47.1% 55.6% 39.4%
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% 2012 45/45 2.1 2.0 62.9% 64.9% 50.6% 55.1% 49.3% 59.5% 43.6%
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% 2013 41/42 2.9 2.1 64.4% 66.3% 47.4% 57.6% 50.6% 59.3% 45.1%
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% 2014 56/60 2.6 2.1 64.0% 65.1% 47.7% 59.9% 44.7% 58.9% 45.0%
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% 2015 36/42 2.1 1.8 66.0% 65.8% 54.1% 55.9% 53.9% 61.6% 43.2%
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% 2016 40/48 2.5 2.8 65.6% 65.1% 47.3% 58.4% 53.6% 59.0% 42.4%
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% 2017 47/48 2.9 2.9 65.5% 64.2% 45.5% 52.2% 45.3% 57.7% 43.3%
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% 2018 34/35 2.4 4.1 64.4% 63.8% 43.6% 56.6% 44.0% 56.6% 41.5%
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% 2019 3/3 3.3 3.0 67.3% 61.0% 43.4% 52.0% 36.3% 55.6% 38.7%
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 442/477 2.5 2.6 63.2% 64.2% 46.6% 54.0% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Ekaterina Makarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 2007 1536 118.3 +1.82 -0.84 0.769 44.4% +21 — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 — — -0.12
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 2008 1626 124.1 -0.08 -0.65 0.958 48.7% -33 -52 +24 46.5% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -0.55
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 2009 1634 131.6 -1.02 +0.38 0.960 49.1% -45 +48 +32 47.4% -0.49 7–8 (47%) 7–0 (100%) 107.5 -0.92
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75 2010 1663 122.5 -0.26 -1.13 0.918 48.3% -104 -64 +173 45.5% -0.53 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -2.59
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 2011 1606 131.9 +0.66 -2.66 0.887 47.4% -47 +70 +141 40.9% -0.75 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 101.5 -1.38
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 2012 1758 146.6 +3.45 +1.31 1.076 51.4% -30 -80 +28 57.1% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 -2.49
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 2013 1836 145.0 +3.78 +1.69 1.108 52.2% -22 -149 -40 59.3% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -1.08
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2014 1841 150.2 +3.13 +1.93 1.095 51.8% +1 -157 +25 60.2% +0.56 11–2 (85%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -1.18
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 2015 1795 142.0 +3.14 +1.65 1.125 52.5% +49 -71 +5 64.8% +0.89 4–7 (36%) 5–1 (83%) 98.0 +1.69
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2016 1776 140.5 +2.86 -0.13 1.035 50.8% +17 -78 +71 55.0% +0.41 8–9 (47%) 3–2 (60%) 96.7 +0.36
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42 2017 1841 148.6 +1.78 +0.54 1.022 50.2% +18 -103 -20 52.7% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 104.6 -2.16
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 2018 1757 140.7 +0.52 -0.09 0.957 49.2% +11 -59 +62 45.8% -0.40 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 -2.54
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 2019 1707 109.2 -2.16 -1.63 0.871 47.4% +6 — — 25.0% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — 0.00
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 — 1942 146.2 +1.78 +0.38 1.014 50.2% -11 -55 +51 52.5% +0.08 72–73 (50%) 49–43 (53%) 104.0 -2.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.