H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 2-1

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 2–1 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Eugenie Bouchard won the 2016 Hobart International first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Eugenie Bouchard
Canada Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eugenie Bouchard #47 6-2 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #64 Match data Jan 13, 2016* R32 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #42 7-5 6-1 Eugenie Bouchard #19 Match data Feb 12, 2014* R64 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #48 6-4 6-3 Eugenie Bouchard #31 Match data Jan 9, 2014* R32 Sydney International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eugenie Bouchard #1,002 #5 4,793 1,927 158 147 51.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Eugenie Bouchard
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #305 1,492 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2012 5–4 55.6% #147 1,546 0 0
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 2013 25–17 59.5% #32 1,751 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 2014 39–23 62.9% #7 1,862 0 1
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 2015 12–17 41.4% #49 1,701 0 1
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2016 29–24 54.7% #46 1,697 0 1
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2017 11–20 35.5% #81 1,601 0 1
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 2018 11–13 45.8% #87 1,670 0 1
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 2019 4–10 28.6% #215 1,617 0 1
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 2020 10–4 71.4% #141 1,713 0 1
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2021 4–3 57.1% #253 1,704 0 1
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 2022 3–5 37.5% #326 1,632 0 1
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2023 3–3 50.0% #287 1,637 0 1
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2025 1–1 50.0% — 1,610 0 1
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Eugenie Bouchard
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 15 11 26 57.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 18 16 34 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 20 16 36 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2020 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — —
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2025 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 98 101 199 49.2% 45 29 74 60.8% 15 17 32 46.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Eugenie Bouchard
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 2.0 2.5 64.1% 64.4% 38.1% 59.9% 56.7% 54.8% 34.9%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% 2012 9/9 3.7 3.1 58.4% 66.2% 47.0% 58.4% 39.6% 58.4% 43.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 34/42 2.3 2.6 56.8% 64.2% 47.1% 51.2% 44.0% 56.7% 46.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 57/62 2.6 3.1 60.4% 66.0% 47.6% 54.0% 50.3% 58.5% 46.5%
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% 2015 25/29 1.7 4.0 60.1% 62.4% 47.7% 49.2% 48.0% 56.8% 41.5%
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% 2016 50/54 2.3 3.2 60.4% 63.6% 48.8% 50.2% 45.9% 57.8% 44.7%
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% 2017 28/31 2.3 3.5 58.3% 58.7% 45.0% 49.3% 48.3% 53.0% 42.7%
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% 2018 24/24 3.0 3.6 59.2% 63.1% 44.0% 57.2% 46.4% 55.5% 44.2%
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% 2019 14/14 1.3 4.0 60.7% 60.7% 42.3% 50.0% 54.0% 53.3% 42.9%
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% 2020 14/14 2.8 1.8 65.5% 65.3% 49.8% 61.5% 49.6% 59.8% 45.5%
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% 2021 7/7 2.7 2.9 62.7% 65.2% 45.7% 49.6% 50.9% 57.9% 46.8%
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% 2022 8/8 2.8 1.5 57.0% 61.4% 51.7% 60.8% 45.3% 57.3% 42.6%
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% 2023 6/6 2.3 1.7 66.8% 62.6% 52.8% 41.7% 51.9% 59.0% 43.5%
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% 2025 2/2 1.0 2.0 62.0% 59.5% 47.9% 54.2% 37.4% 55.1% 41.8%
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 282/306 2.4 3.1 60.0% 63.5% 47.1% 52.6% 47.7% 56.9% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Eugenie Bouchard
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 2011 1493 102.7 -1.04 -2.27 0.773 45.8% +18 — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 2012 1546 114.3 +1.12 -0.43 1.033 50.7% +7 — — 52.4% +0.38 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 2013 1752 141.5 +1.07 +2.65 1.074 51.5% -37 -74 -156 58.2% +0.47 7–9 (44%) 8–1 (89%) 106.1 -1.18
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 2014 1863 150.8 +2.70 +3.29 1.122 52.4% -96 +19 -107 61.4% +0.82 10–8 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 104.2 -1.19
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 2015 1702 123.0 -1.20 +0.51 0.961 49.3% +34 +67 -27 50.0% -0.02 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 94.8 +1.50
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75 2016 1697 133.5 +1.68 +1.09 1.060 51.1% -16 +85 -6 54.6% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 -1.41
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 2017 1602 127.4 -1.89 -0.77 0.909 47.9% -17 +221 +25 40.3% -0.82 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.2 -0.95
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 2018 1670 127.3 -0.75 +1.08 0.994 49.8% -14 +151 — 42.2% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 106.6 +0.16
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 2019 1617 127.0 -1.49 -0.31 0.919 47.9% +26 — — 38.2% -0.62 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.76
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2020 1713 127.8 +1.82 +1.44 1.130 52.7% -64 +114 — 65.7% +1.00 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 +0.41
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 2021 1704 112.6 +0.44 +0.05 1.114 52.1% -53 — — 53.3% +0.40 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.45
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2022 1633 117.1 +0.22 +0.59 0.998 50.2% -38 — — 52.9% +0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.2 +0.57
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42 2023 1637 118.3 +0.17 -0.98 1.060 51.3% — +151 — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +1.03
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 2024 1618 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 2025 1611 113.9 +1.04 -0.76 0.931 48.7% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — 0.00
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 — 1927 140.4 +0.68 +1.24 1.032 50.6% -27 +65 -55 53.1% +0.19 43–57 (43%) 45–29 (61%) 102.0 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.