H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 2-1

Bethanie Mattek-Sands holds a 2–1 lead over Johanna Larsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Bethanie Mattek-Sands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands
United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Johanna Larsson
Sweden Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #202 6-4 6-3 Johanna Larsson #59 Match data May 29, 2018* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Johanna Larsson #55 7-5 6-2 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #106 Match data Jul 14, 2016* R32 Gstaad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #31 6-7(1) 6-0 7-6(5) Johanna Larsson #61 Match data Jun 10, 2011* R16 Copenhagen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johanna Larsson #236 #45 1,230 1,733 153 178 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Johanna Larsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #389 1,502 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #177 1,509 0 0
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 2009 0–2 0.0% #172 1,492 0 0
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% #69 1,555 0 0
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2011 19–18 51.4% #59 1,666 0 0
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2012 14–19 42.4% #73 1,624 0 0
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 2013 13–16 44.8% #84 1,624 0 0
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 2014 7–15 31.8% #70 1,596 0 0
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 2015 25–19 56.8% #56 1,668 0 1
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2016 29–25 53.7% #50 1,707 0 1
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 2017 15–21 41.7% #80 1,623 0 1
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2018 17–18 48.6% #75 1,599 0 2
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 2019 3–13 18.8% #217 1,557 0 2
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #236 1,543 0 2
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Johanna Larsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2012 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2015 16 13 29 55.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 19 15 34 55.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2019 1 7 8 12.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — 78 100 178 43.8% 72 62 134 53.7% 3 15 18 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 295/330 of Johanna Larsson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Johanna Larsson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 3.0 2.5 44.9% 79.7% 47.8% 53.3% 12.5% 62.4% 34.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 3.0 5.0 52.5% 63.7% 45.6% 41.9% 45.5% 55.2% 41.4%
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% 2010 16/18 3.0 2.8 60.5% 67.0% 45.2% 65.3% 43.3% 58.2% 42.3%
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% 2011 32/37 1.8 3.3 61.4% 59.4% 44.9% 49.2% 48.7% 53.7% 43.6%
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% 2012 30/33 2.2 3.4 59.5% 58.3% 45.2% 49.6% 46.8% 52.6% 41.5%
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% 2013 24/29 2.0 3.0 63.8% 61.0% 44.1% 51.3% 37.7% 55.0% 39.5%
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% 2014 18/22 1.5 3.3 71.1% 56.8% 43.4% 47.0% 43.4% 53.0% 40.0%
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% 2015 30/44 1.5 2.9 69.7% 59.8% 54.4% 50.8% 52.3% 57.9% 43.3%
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% 2016 53/55 2.3 3.6 63.4% 60.9% 45.5% 49.9% 47.1% 55.3% 43.8%
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% 2017 36/36 1.4 3.5 67.2% 59.2% 43.0% 50.3% 38.8% 53.9% 41.3%
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% 2018 35/35 1.8 3.8 62.2% 60.7% 45.9% 50.0% 41.9% 55.0% 42.7%
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% 2019 16/16 1.5 3.2 64.3% 55.9% 42.5% 50.7% 41.2% 51.1% 34.7%
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% 2020 1/1 0.0 3.0 65.0% 42.3% 35.7% 50.0% 0.0% 40.0% 30.4%
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% — 295/332 1.9 3.3 64.0% 60.0% 45.6% 50.7% 44.2% 54.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Johanna Larsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1472 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1471 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.24 2006 1503 104.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.16
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 — — 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1446 108.5 — — — — +27 — — 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.26 2008 1510 100.9 +0.29 -1.15 0.907 46.1% — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 1–0 — +0.06
20 2005 1489 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 — -0.17 2009 1493 103.2 -0.43 -1.92 0.925 48.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 2010 1555 121.7 +0.59 -1.39 1.013 50.2% +38 -47 — 47.1% -0.15 0–2 2–3 (40%) — +0.25
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 — +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 — -0.75 2011 1666 118.5 -1.99 -0.93 0.942 48.7% -78 -7 -63 48.2% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.7 -0.99
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 2012 1625 112.1 -1.63 -2.02 0.876 47.3% -42 +36 — 39.1% -1.07 4–5 (44%) 5–1 (83%) 101.4 +0.21
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 — 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 2013 1624 121.5 -0.43 -2.79 0.877 47.2% -56 +95 — 42.4% -0.42 6–2 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 102.4 -1.47
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 2014 1596 123.3 -2.35 -1.81 0.853 46.6% -12 +47 — 32.7% -0.78 3–2 (60%) 1–6 (14%) 98.3 -1.78
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 — 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2015 1668 125.8 -0.89 +0.77 1.028 50.4% -9 +58 -181 54.9% +0.21 3–4 (43%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 +0.01
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 — — 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 — -1.24 2016 1708 126.0 -0.78 +0.26 0.982 49.7% +5 +2 — 54.4% -0.04 9–10 (47%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.87
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 — 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2017 1624 122.5 -2.11 -1.71 0.896 47.6% +12 +71 — 43.2% -0.48 6–5 (55%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.48
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 — — 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — -0.42 2018 1600 119.2 -1.77 -0.96 0.947 48.7% -13 +94 -110 47.0% -0.55 8–7 (53%) 9–1 (90%) 111.4 -1.03
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 2019 1558 102.9 -3.75 -5.03 0.710 43.5% -46 +116 — 18.8% -2.53 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -1.07
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 — 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 2020 1544 90.5 +0.79 -0.26 0.507 34.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.14
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 — 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 — — 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1587 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1533 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1531 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 — 1733 124.4 -1.43 -1.21 0.922 48.2% -15 +46 -113 45.3% -0.47 49–44 (53%) 42–38 (53%) 106.7 -2.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.