H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-3
Roberta Vinci holds a 3–1 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bethanie Mattek-Sands won the 2015 Beijing fourth round 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2013* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2013* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Roberta Vinci | 6-4 6-2 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2012* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Roberta Vinci | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |