H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-5

Shahar Peer holds a 5–0 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2011 Indian Wells second round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

USA Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 5
5 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #12 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #43 Match data
May 26, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Shahar Peer #18 3-6 6-0 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #124 Match data
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #20 6-2 6-3 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #133 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Shahar Peer #19 6-2 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #123 Match data
Feb 24, 2007* Memphis WTA 500 QF Hard Shahar Peer #17 6-0 6-3 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #126 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,777 132 172 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,447 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,489 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,572 0 0 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,622 0 0 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,702 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,707 0 0 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,666 0 0 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,692 0 0 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,681 0 0
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 2018 1–7 12.5% #350 1,600 0 0
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,583 0 0
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,605 0 0
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,597 0 0
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,544 0 0