H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Bettina Bunge vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 3-0
Bettina Bunge holds a 3–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1986 Lugano fourth round 3-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 63
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1986* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Bettina Bunge | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bettina Bunge | 6-1 6-3 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| May 9, 1980* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Bettina Bunge | 7-6 6-2 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bettina Bunge | #135 | #8 | 58 | 2,123 | 294 | 182 | 61.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bettina Bunge | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1979 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1980 | 31–23 | 57.4% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,023 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 26–11 | 70.3% | — | 2,012 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1984 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #12 | 2,014 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1989 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #72 | 1,903 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |