H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bibiane Schoofs vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 1-0
Bibiane Schoofs holds a 1–0 lead over Angelique Kerber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bibiane Schoofs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bibiane Schoofs won the 2011 Luxembourg third round 2-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2011* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Bibiane Schoofs | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bibiane Schoofs | #1,207 | #142 | 448 | 1,573 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bibiane Schoofs | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #161 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #168 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |