H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic vs Michelle Larcher De Brito H2H: 0-1
Michelle Larcher De Brito holds a 1–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Larcher De Brito leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2012 Birmingham second round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 33
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2012* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Michelle Larcher De Brito | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michelle Larcher De Brito | #1,216 | #76 | 821 | 1,630 | 30 | 42 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Michelle Larcher De Brito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #296 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #130 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #113 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #210 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #117 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #226 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |