H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bonnie Gadusek vs Elise Burgin H2H: 2-2
Bonnie Gadusek and Elise Burgin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Bonnie Gadusek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1986 Tampa third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1986* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-1 6-0 | Bonnie Gadusek | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1985* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Bonnie Gadusek | 6-4 7-6 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1985* | Indianapolis 1 | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-1 7-5 | Bonnie Gadusek | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Bonnie Gadusek | 6-0 6-0 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonnie Gadusek | — | — | — | 2,074 | 189 | 94 | 66.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bonnie Gadusek | Elise Burgin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1980 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,738 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 39–24 | 61.9% | — | 1,912 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |