H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Brenda Remilton vs Julie Harrington H2H: 0-1

Julie Harrington holds a 1–0 lead over Brenda Remilton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Harrington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Harrington won the 1983 Tokyo Borden round of 32 6-3 0-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Remilton
AUS
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julie Harrington
USA Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Harrington 6-3 0-6 6-4 Brenda Remilton Match data Oct 13, 1983* R32 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Remilton — — — 1,669 39 43 47.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Harrington — #70 — 1,742 56 81 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Brenda Remilton Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 22–18 55.0% — 1,553 0 0 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
1981 15–13 53.6% — 1,636 0 0 1980 13–18 41.9% — 1,605 0 0
1982 0–5 0.0% — 1,576 0 0 1981 18–15 54.5% — 1,725 0 0
1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,548 0 0 1982 6–19 24.0% — 1,590 0 0
1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,530 0 0 1983 15–16 48.4% — 1,629 0 0
— — — — — — — 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Brenda Remilton Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 2 1 3 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1979 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
1983 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5%
1984 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 2 5 7 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 10 16 26 38.5% — — — — Career 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 12 23 35 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Brenda Remilton Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1553 117.3 — — — — — -46 -2 50.6% +0.21 8–5 (62%) 4–1 (80%) 107.1 +1.23 1979 1524 114.7 — — — — +97 — — 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.67
1981 1636 120.9 — — — — — -86 -13 50.0% +0.05 6–2 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -1.46 1980 1606 124.5 — — — — -18 -23 -131 43.3% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.8 -0.77
1982 1577 101.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.17 0–2 1–0 — -0.41 1981 1726 127.8 — — — — +23 -106 — 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 +3.25
1983 1548 104.1 — — — — — — +35 31.3% -0.44 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.65 1982 1590 116.7 — — — — -34 +6 — 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.72
1984 1531 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.13 1983 1630 115.7 — — — — +32 -33 — 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.38
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1572 106.0 — — — — +13 — — 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.38
Career 1669 116.9 — — — — — -59 +2 45.4% -0.14 15–10 (60%) 8–6 (57%) 106.6 -0.15 Career 1743 124.2 — — — — +16 -29 -131 42.1% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +3.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.