H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Cagla Buyukakcay vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 1-1

Cagla Buyukakcay and Lucie Hradecka are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cagla Buyukakcay won the 2016 Qatar Open first round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cagla Buyukakcay
Turkey Age 36 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cagla Buyukakcay #161 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 Lucie Hradecka #73 Match data Feb 23, 2016* R64 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lucie Hradecka #70 4-6 6-3 6-0 Cagla Buyukakcay #295 Match data Jul 30, 2009* R32 Istanbul International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cagla Buyukakcay #426 #60 980 1,613 22 53 29.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Lucie Hradecka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 0–1 0.0% #388 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #191 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0
23 2013 0–1 0.0% #158 1,438 0 0 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0
24 2014 3–6 33.3% #137 1,442 0 0 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0
25 2015 2–8 20.0% #126 1,423 0 0 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0
26 2016 12–12 50.0% #83 1,528 0 1 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0
27 2017 4–10 28.6% #160 1,513 0 1 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0
28 2018 0–3 0.0% #264 1,522 0 1 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0
29 2019 0–2 0.0% #179 1,533 0 1 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #178 1,560 0 1 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0
31 2021 0–4 0.0% #241 1,513 0 1 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0
33 2023 1–1 50.0% #382 1,471 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Lucie Hradecka
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2014 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 5 6 11 45.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 0 5 5 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2019 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 28 37 24.3% 13 23 36 36.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 70/74 of Cagla Buyukakcay's and 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Lucie Hradecka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 1/1 2.0 11.0 64.2% 69.1% 26.3% 40.0% 62.5% 53.8% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 62.1% 40.7% 48.5% 30.8% 45.5% 43.7% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1/1 3.0 7.0 58.3% 61.9% 26.7% 33.3% 33.3% 47.2% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1/1 1.0 2.0 50.0% 35.7% 46.4% 45.5% 50.0% 41.1% 32.5% 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6%
24 2014 6/9 1.0 2.2 77.4% 57.8% 48.3% 49.0% 66.6% 55.9% 41.8% 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9%
25 2015 10/10 1.1 1.4 70.7% 56.7% 44.8% 46.6% 42.1% 53.2% 39.2% 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8%
26 2016 23/24 0.9 2.1 72.8% 60.3% 44.0% 51.9% 53.3% 56.2% 43.8% 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1%
27 2017 14/14 0.8 1.9 72.2% 51.3% 46.6% 50.0% 44.8% 50.5% 39.6% 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8%
28 2018 3/3 0.0 1.3 73.7% 46.1% 30.8% 31.0% 35.0% 42.0% 39.6% 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5%
29 2019 2/2 0.0 1.5 63.9% 53.8% 36.3% 43.8% 37.5% 47.5% 40.6% 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0%
30 2020 2/2 0.0 4.5 74.3% 53.9% 30.5% 57.7% 73.3% 47.8% 40.6% 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5%
31 2021 4/4 0.0 3.0 70.6% 54.0% 39.4% 42.2% 19.1% 49.9% 34.3% 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3%
33 2023 2/2 0.5 2.0 78.0% 54.7% 36.4% 44.4% 45.0% 50.7% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3%
Career — 70/75 0.8 2.3 71.8% 55.8% 42.9% 48.0% 48.0% 52.4% 41.1% — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Lucie Hradecka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1483 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1468 99.2 -1.12 -0.54 0.855 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1457 96.7 -2.02 +3.84 0.842 45.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1447 101.4 -4.34 0.00 0.870 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
23 2013 1439 95.4 -4.52 -3.14 0.552 37.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
24 2014 1443 104.7 -0.68 +0.08 0.946 49.6% +20 — — 33.3% -0.83 0–2 0–2 — +0.25 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41
25 2015 1423 111.8 -1.87 -2.44 0.838 46.4% +37 +52 — 26.1% -1.39 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 -0.22 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10
26 2016 1529 118.4 -0.08 +0.21 1.000 50.1% -35 +83 — 50.0% +0.06 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 -0.09 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58
27 2017 1513 103.4 -3.91 -1.84 0.800 45.3% -77 +91 — 36.4% -1.36 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 -0.02 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15
28 2018 1522 102.5 -2.80 -0.42 0.682 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.23 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39
29 2019 1533 105.1 -1.34 -0.45 0.773 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.22 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33
30 2020 1560 107.9 -2.62 +0.10 0.777 45.3% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.08 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33
31 2021 1513 99.5 -0.59 -0.91 0.685 42.6% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 1–0 — -0.38 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49
33 2023 1472 97.9 -1.98 -1.25 0.927 48.8% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1459 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
35 2025 1411 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1393 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
Career — 1613 110.3 -1.63 -0.75 0.865 47.0% -12 +82 — 33.9% -1.13 5–15 (25%) 8–15 (35%) 89.7 -1.16 — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.