H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cagla Buyukakcay vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 1-1
Cagla Buyukakcay and Lucie Hradecka are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cagla Buyukakcay won the 2016 Doha second round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2016* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Cagla Buyukakcay | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2009* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lucie Hradecka | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Cagla Buyukakcay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cagla Buyukakcay | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |