H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Cagla Buyukakcay vs Timea Babos H2H: 1-0
Cagla Buyukakcay holds a 1–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cagla Buyukakcay leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cagla Buyukakcay won the 2017 Istanbul fourth round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2017* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Cagla Buyukakcay | 6-4 7-6(5) | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cagla Buyukakcay | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |