H2H data updated: 2026-11-07 00:00 UTC

Cagla Buyukakcay vs Vania King H2H: 0-1

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Cagla Buyukakcay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vania King won the 2016 Bucharest second round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cagla Buyukakcay
Turkey Age 37 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #144 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 Cagla Buyukakcay #73 Match data Jul 15, 2016* R16 Bucharest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cagla Buyukakcay #435 #60 980 1,613 22 53 29.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2008 0–1 0.0% #388 1,468 0 0 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #191 1,447 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1
23 2013 0–1 0.0% #158 1,438 0 0 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1
24 2014 3–6 33.3% #137 1,443 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2015 2–8 20.0% #126 1,423 0 0 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2016 12–12 50.0% #83 1,528 0 1 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2017 4–10 28.6% #160 1,513 0 1 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2018 0–3 0.0% #264 1,522 0 1 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2019 0–2 0.0% #179 1,533 0 1 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #178 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2021 0–4 0.0% #241 1,513 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 1–1 50.0% #382 1,471 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2016 5 6 11 45.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 0 5 5 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 28 37 24.3% 13 23 36 36.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 70/74 of Cagla Buyukakcay's and 237/289 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2008 1/1 2.0 11.0 64.2% 69.1% 26.3% 40.0% 62.5% 53.8% 39.5% 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 62.1% 40.7% 48.5% 30.8% 45.5% 43.7% 47.4% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2010 1/1 3.0 7.0 58.3% 61.9% 26.7% 33.3% 33.3% 47.2% 45.9% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2013 1/1 1.0 2.0 50.0% 35.7% 46.4% 45.5% 50.0% 41.1% 32.5% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2014 6/9 1.0 2.2 77.4% 57.8% 48.3% 49.0% 66.6% 55.9% 41.8% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2015 10/10 1.1 1.4 70.7% 56.7% 44.8% 46.6% 42.1% 53.2% 39.2% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2016 23/24 0.9 2.1 72.8% 60.3% 44.0% 51.9% 53.3% 56.2% 43.8% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2017 14/14 0.8 1.9 72.2% 51.3% 46.6% 50.0% 44.8% 50.5% 39.6% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2018 3/3 0.0 1.3 73.7% 46.1% 30.8% 31.0% 35.0% 42.0% 39.6% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2019 2/2 0.0 1.5 63.9% 53.8% 36.3% 43.8% 37.5% 47.5% 40.6% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2020 2/2 0.0 4.5 74.3% 53.9% 30.5% 57.7% 73.3% 47.8% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 4/4 0.0 3.0 70.6% 54.0% 39.4% 42.2% 19.1% 49.9% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 2/2 0.5 2.0 78.0% 54.7% 36.4% 44.4% 45.0% 50.7% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70/75 0.8 2.3 71.8% 55.8% 42.9% 47.9% 48.0% 52.4% 41.1% — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cagla Buyukakcay Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1483 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2008 1468 99.2 -1.12 -0.54 0.855 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.07 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51
19 2009 1457 96.7 -2.02 +3.84 0.842 45.5% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10
20 2010 1447 101.4 -4.34 0.00 0.870 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — 0.00 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2013 1439 95.4 -4.52 -3.14 0.552 37.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.03 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2014 1443 104.7 -0.68 +0.08 0.946 49.6% +20 — — 33.3% -0.83 0–2 0–2 — +0.25 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2015 1423 111.8 -1.87 -2.44 0.838 46.4% +38 +52 — 26.1% -1.39 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 -0.22 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2016 1529 118.4 -0.08 +0.21 1.000 50.1% -34 +83 — 50.0% +0.06 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 -0.09 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2017 1513 103.4 -3.91 -1.84 0.800 45.3% -77 +92 — 36.4% -1.36 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 -0.02 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2018 1523 102.5 -2.80 -0.42 0.682 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.23 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2019 1533 105.1 -1.34 -0.45 0.773 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — -0.22 2018 1560 108.6 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2020 1560 107.9 -2.62 +0.10 0.777 45.3% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.07 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1513 99.6 -0.59 -0.91 0.685 42.6% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 1–0 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1472 97.9 -1.98 -1.25 0.927 48.8% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1459 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1411 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1406 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1614 110.4 -1.63 -0.75 0.865 47.0% -12 +82 — 33.9% -1.13 5–15 (25%) 8–15 (35%) 89.7 -1.15 — 1768 128.4 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.