Camila Osorio
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC
Laura Pigossi holds a 1–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Pigossi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Pigossi won the 2022 Bogotá Open semifinal 7-5 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Laura Pigossi | Match data | Mar 4, 2024 | Q1 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Laura Pigossi | 7-5 7-6(2) | Camila Osorio | Match data | Apr 9, 2022* | SF | Bogotá Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #68 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,824 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laura Pigossi | #247 | #100 | 684 | 1,592 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Laura Pigossi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #429 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #110 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Laura Pigossi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 48 | 60 | 108 | 44.4% | 52 | 25 | 77 | 67.5% | 5 | 14 | 19 | 26.3% | — | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 187/206 of Camila Osorio's and 32/35 of Laura Pigossi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Laura Pigossi | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 61.9% | 32.1% | 58.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 57.8% | 62.9% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 41.6% | 56.3% | 47.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 61.1% | 38.4% | 51.1% | 49.0% | 52.7% | 48.0% | 2014 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.6% | 42.9% | 15.8% | 46.2% | 33.3% | 31.9% | 34.2% |
| 20 | 2022 | 30/31 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.6% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 44.0% | 53.3% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 32/32 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 64.2% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 50.7% | 40.1% | 53.9% | 44.9% | 2016 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 58.7% | 66.7% | 42.1% | 44.4% | 66.7% | 56.5% | 40.7% |
| 22 | 2024 | 32/35 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 45.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 26/39 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 62.6% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 54.1% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 34/35 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 64.1% | 62.1% | 44.4% | 50.6% | 51.4% | 55.5% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 16/16 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 75.1% | 54.7% | 42.9% | 52.1% | 47.2% | 51.9% | 41.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7/7 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 69.4% | 56.2% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 52.9% | 52.3% | 45.9% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 70.1% | 54.8% | 42.9% | 56.3% | 43.2% | 50.2% | 46.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2/4 | 2.0 | 5.5 | 66.5% | 54.7% | 33.0% | 52.1% | 85.7% | 47.7% | 40.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 68.0% | 56.9% | 45.8% | 54.6% | 22.2% | 53.3% | 38.2% |
| Career | — | 187/206 | 1.3 | 5.2 | 64.5% | 60.6% | 41.3% | 51.0% | 47.0% | 53.7% | 45.5% | — | 32/35 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 71.5% | 55.1% | 41.8% | 52.3% | 49.8% | 51.1% | 42.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Laura Pigossi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2016 | 1483 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2017 | 1466 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1454 | 96.2 | -0.76 | -2.99 | 0.738 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1488 | 103.3 | +0.83 | +0.51 | 1.091 | 51.8% | — | +17 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 1699 | 120.1 | -2.66 | +3.25 | 1.014 | 50.4% | -108 | +13 | -63 | 52.3% | +0.08 | 7–0 (100%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.0 | -0.69 | 2014 | 1484 | 92.8 | -5.88 | -0.67 | 0.502 | 32.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1689 | 126.5 | -2.72 | +0.83 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -8 | +34 | -184 | 48.3% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.1 | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1731 | 132.4 | -1.96 | +1.86 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -54 | +87 | -241 | 52.9% | -0.04 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.3 | -2.02 | 2016 | 1450 | 102.8 | -0.49 | -0.07 | 0.936 | 48.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.16 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1757 | 132.8 | -3.36 | +0.94 | 0.954 | 49.1% | -66 | +105 | -187 | 53.8% | +0.01 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 100.9 | -0.70 | 2017 | 1438 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 1710 | 136.1 | -2.43 | +1.11 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -15 | +115 | — | 51.1% | +0.06 | 9–6 (60%) | 2–5 (29%) | 100.0 | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 1740 | 143.5 | -1.23 | +2.73 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +9 | +72 | — | 48.2% | +0.04 | 6–8 (43%) | 3–8 (27%) | 96.0 | -1.51 | 2019 | 1426 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1448 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1508 | 110.3 | -3.24 | -1.90 | 0.866 | 46.8% | — | +74 | — | 48.6% | -0.78 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.08 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1529 | 97.2 | -1.69 | +0.69 | 0.963 | 49.1% | -102 | +53 | — | 31.3% | -0.87 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +1.15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1518 | 116.0 | -2.21 | -1.10 | 0.932 | 48.5% | — | +38 | — | 38.5% | -0.77 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.03 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1470 | 106.6 | -1.85 | -1.53 | 0.766 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 45.5% | +0.27 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | 0.00 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1402 | 91.0 | +0.83 | -2.92 | 0.818 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| Career | — | 1824 | 136.4 | -2.31 | +1.76 | 0.983 | 49.6% | -33 | +71 | -164 | 51.1% | -0.02 | 37–29 (56%) | 32–32 (50%) | 105.5 | -1.99 | — | 1593 | 105.0 | -2.55 | -1.15 | 0.873 | 47.0% | -102 | +63 | — | 41.2% | -0.81 | 6–9 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.2 | +3.51 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Nadia Podoroska | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 4, 2024 | H2H |
| Ana Bogdan | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 29, 2022 | H2H |
| Vendula Valdmannova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 11, 2025 | H2H |