H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 2-1
Camila Osorio holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2023 Guadalajara second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 6-1 6-2 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2023* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2022* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Camila Osorio | 6-3 7-6(6) | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |