Camila Osorio
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Martina Trevisan H2H: 0-2
Martina Trevisan holds a 2–0 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Trevisan leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Trevisan won the 2023 Hamburg Open second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-2 | Martina Trevisan | Match data | Oct 5, 2024 | Q1 | Wuhan Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Martina Trevisan | 6-1 6-3 | Camila Osorio | Match data | Jul 27, 2023* | R16 | Hamburg Open | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Martina Trevisan | 6-3 6-4 | Camila Osorio | Match data | Oct 13, 2022* | R32 | San Diego | WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #59 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,826 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Martina Trevisan | #325 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,764 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 47 | 58 | 105 | 44.8% | 52 | 25 | 77 | 67.5% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | 25 | 47 | 72 | 34.7% | 26 | 32 | 58 | 44.8% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/202 of Camila Osorio's and 136/137 of Martina Trevisan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 61.9% | 32.1% | 58.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 57.8% | 62.9% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 41.6% | 56.3% | 47.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 61.1% | 38.4% | 51.1% | 49.0% | 52.7% | 48.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 30/31 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.6% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 44.0% | 53.3% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 32/32 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 64.2% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 50.7% | 40.1% | 53.9% | 44.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 32/35 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 45.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 26/38 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 62.6% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 54.1% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 44.7% | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 71.2% | 54.3% | 35.0% | 36.5% | 30.0% | 48.2% | 37.7% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/32 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 63.7% | 62.3% | 44.9% | 50.3% | 52.9% | 55.7% | 45.9% | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 70.4% | 50.5% | 41.5% | 49.1% | 75.0% | 47.6% | 40.5% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5/5 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 70.2% | 50.5% | 40.6% | 49.1% | 79.4% | 47.8% | 46.0% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6/6 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 70.0% | 53.9% | 44.5% | 52.7% | 54.5% | 51.0% | 46.9% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 19/19 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 65.8% | 56.3% | 40.4% | 52.5% | 54.8% | 50.8% | 39.1% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 33/34 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 66.3% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 49.3% | 53.1% | 53.2% | 46.9% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 40/40 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 63.7% | 58.1% | 46.6% | 46.4% | 47.9% | 53.8% | 44.3% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27/27 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 66.2% | 58.7% | 41.6% | 54.2% | 39.5% | 53.0% | 40.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 66.7% | 47.1% | 47.1% | 37.5% | 28.6% | 47.1% | 39.3% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 68.2% | 56.9% | 44.4% | 58.3% | 75.0% | 52.9% | 50.7% |
| Career | — | 184/202 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 64.4% | 60.6% | 41.4% | 51.0% | 47.3% | 53.7% | 45.6% | — | 136/137 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 65.9% | 57.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 50.1% | 52.5% | 43.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2016 | 1483 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2017 | 1465 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1454 | 96.2 | -0.76 | -2.99 | 0.738 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1488 | 103.3 | +0.83 | +0.51 | 1.091 | 51.8% | — | +17 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 1699 | 120.1 | -2.66 | +3.25 | 1.014 | 50.4% | -108 | +13 | -63 | 52.3% | +0.08 | 7–0 (100%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.0 | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1689 | 126.5 | -2.72 | +0.83 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -8 | +34 | -184 | 48.3% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.1 | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1731 | 132.4 | -1.96 | +1.86 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -54 | +87 | -241 | 52.9% | -0.04 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.3 | -2.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 1757 | 132.8 | -3.36 | +0.94 | 0.954 | 49.1% | -66 | +105 | -187 | 53.8% | +0.01 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 100.9 | -0.70 | 2016 | 1484 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 1719 | 136.8 | -2.42 | +1.16 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -24 | +106 | — | 51.7% | +0.08 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–5 (29%) | 101.1 | -0.23 | 2017 | 1514 | 102.3 | -0.97 | -0.26 | 0.728 | 42.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 24 | 2026 | 1745 | 142.0 | -1.22 | +2.82 | 1.037 | 50.9% | +16 | +70 | — | 48.7% | +0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.1 | -1.01 | 2018 | 1506 | 105.2 | -3.70 | -0.66 | 0.772 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1488 | 107.8 | -2.05 | +1.06 | 0.882 | 47.1% | — | +68 | — | 27.3% | -1.36 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1585 | 114.3 | -1.53 | +3.00 | 0.957 | 49.2% | — | +81 | — | 50.0% | -0.58 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.46 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1592 | 112.8 | -4.04 | -2.30 | 0.795 | 45.5% | -123 | +75 | — | 23.8% | -1.45 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.44 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1694 | 124.5 | -2.59 | +3.01 | 1.004 | 50.3% | -183 | +134 | — | 52.1% | +0.11 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–3 (40%) | 104.5 | +0.59 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1725 | 138.7 | -1.58 | +0.90 | 0.959 | 49.2% | -50 | +34 | — | 48.8% | -0.16 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.68 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1603 | 114.6 | -3.10 | -1.85 | 0.859 | 46.8% | -60 | +125 | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | 96.3 | +0.46 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1485 | 97.5 | -1.75 | -1.22 | 0.743 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1536 | 99.8 | -2.20 | +1.30 | 1.076 | 51.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 |
| Career | — | 1826 | 136.1 | -2.33 | +1.77 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -34 | +69 | -164 | 51.3% | -0.01 | 37–27 (58%) | 32–31 (51%) | 106.7 | -1.82 | — | 1764 | 123.1 | -2.51 | +0.46 | 0.916 | 48.2% | -94 | +92 | — | 40.4% | -0.62 | 17–22 (44%) | 11–12 (48%) | 99.5 | +0.64 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Martina Trevisan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | 4 | 0 | 4 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 9, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 5, 2023 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 28, 2023 | H2H |