H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Camille Benjamin vs Elise Burgin H2H: 1-4

Elise Burgin holds a 4–1 lead over Camille Benjamin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Elise Burgin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1989 Phoenix round of 16 6-4 5-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Elise Burgin
USA Age 64 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elise Burgin #83 6-4 5-7 6-1 Camille Benjamin #96 Match data Sep 15, 1989* R16 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Camille Benjamin #94 6-4 3-6 6-4 Elise Burgin #74 Match data Jun 21, 1989* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Elise Burgin #31 7-5 6-3 Camille Benjamin #66 Match data May 22, 1986* R32 Lugano WTA 250 Clay
Elise Burgin 6-3 6-7 6-4 Camille Benjamin #50 Match data Jun 14, 1985* R16 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Elise Burgin 7-6 6-2 Camille Benjamin Match data Aug 12, 1983* R16 Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camille Benjamin — #27 13 1,821 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elise Burgin — #27 20 1,846 132 165 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camille Benjamin Elise Burgin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,629 0 0 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,509 0 0
20 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0 1982 7–10 41.2% — 1,584 0 0
21 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0 1983 13–9 59.1% — 1,743 0 0
22 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0 1984 9–15 37.5% #51 1,716 0 0
23 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0 1985 29–23 55.8% — 1,773 0 0
24 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0 1986 25–22 53.2% #40 1,776 0 1
25 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0 1987 17–21 44.7% #66 1,703 0 1
26 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0 1988 5–12 29.4% #108 1,629 0 1
27 1993 1–3 25.0% — 1,516 0 0 1989 16–19 45.7% #62 1,700 0 1
28 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0 1990 7–19 26.9% #149 1,569 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #299 1,527 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #166 1,523 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #400 1,496 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camille Benjamin Elise Burgin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1982 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 5 12 17 29.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8% — 64 77 141 45.4% 34 30 64 53.1% 26 34 60 43.3% 8 24 32 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camille Benjamin Elise Burgin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1690 123.6 — — — — +58 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.7 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1716 124.5 — — — — -16 -37 -117 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1768 138.9 — — — — -53 -5 -97 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.31 1980 1476 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
19 1985 1629 116.9 — — — — +23 +3 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.67 1981 1509 111.6 — — — — +69 — — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — -0.27
20 1986 1609 118.7 — — — — -5 +36 +19 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.68 1982 1585 111.5 — — — — +15 — — 37.8% -1.19 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.6 -0.39
21 1987 1655 128.4 — — — — -4 -9 +6 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 -0.10 1983 1744 128.2 — — — — +5 — -177 54.0% +0.10 5–1 (83%) 2–0 — -0.98
22 1988 1601 121.0 — — — — -5 +27 +18 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.03 1984 1717 125.5 — — — — -22 — -104 37.5% -0.88 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 -2.46
23 1989 1652 129.0 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.46 1985 1773 137.6 — — — — -63 -52 -73 51.7% +0.03 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 106.3 -1.47
24 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55 1986 1776 142.8 — — — — -21 +19 -104 53.2% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 98.8 -2.42
25 1991 1560 107.1 — — — — -32 +85 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1987 1703 130.3 — — — — -18 +39 +12 45.2% -0.32 4–6 (40%) 5–4 (56%) 98.4 -1.43
26 1992 1528 113.1 — — — — -19 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34 1988 1630 115.9 — — — — +12 — +20 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -0.24
27 1993 1517 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04 1989 1701 132.5 — — — — -21 +35 -80 47.6% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.1 -1.29
28 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11 1990 1569 112.5 — — — — -10 +144 +32 32.8% -1.49 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.2 -1.68
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1528 99.8 — — — — -19 — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1524 109.4 — — — — +1 +174 — 37.5% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1497 97.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.02
Career — 1822 128.5 — — — — -2 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21 — 1846 134.4 — — — — -16 +27 -61 44.7% -0.47 47–47 (50%) 32–28 (53%) 102.8 -4.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.