H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Cammy Macgregor vs Ruth Seeman H2H: 0-1

Ruth Seeman holds a 1–0 lead over Cammy Macgregor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruth Seeman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruth Seeman won the 1988 ASB Classic round of 64 6-1 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cammy Macgregor
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ruth Seeman
NZL Age 63

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ruth Seeman 6-1 3-6 6-4 Cammy Macgregor #131 Match data Jan 27, 1988* R64 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cammy Macgregor #625 #75 14 1,604 48 87 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ruth Seeman — — — 1,541 9 11 45.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cammy Macgregor Ruth Seeman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 4–3 57.1% — 1,509 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1986 5–9 35.7% #77 1,534 0 0 1980 6–4 60.0% — 1,504 0 0
18 1987 11–17 39.3% #134 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 4–11 26.7% #188 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1989 8–9 47.1% #96 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 8–16 33.3% #119 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1991 4–7 36.4% #166 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1992 2–6 25.0% #198 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1993 2–9 18.2% #194 1,456 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1988 2–3 40.0% — 1,505 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cammy Macgregor Ruth Seeman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1987 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 48 80 40.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 16 22 27.3% 2 7 9 22.2% — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cammy Macgregor Ruth Seeman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1510 98.3 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.13 0–1 — — +0.27 1979 1484 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.06
17 1986 1535 112.3 — — — — +5 — +100 38.7% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.56 1980 1505 112.2 — — — — — — — 57.9% +1.16 0–1 — — +0.95
18 1987 1522 96.7 — — — — +33 — -14 37.7% -0.89 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.9 +3.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1504 126.9 — — — — +43 — — 37.1% -0.89 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.1 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1577 119.8 — — — — +24 — — 43.9% -0.68 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.5 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1518 107.0 — — — — +28 -16 — 38.2% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 97.7 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 1521 113.3 — — — — +17 -24 — 41.4% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 1515 116.8 — — — — +43 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1993 1456 107.1 — — — — +39 — +24 32.1% -1.04 1–5 (17%) — — +0.31 1987 1510 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1506 98.6 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.08
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1486 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.01
Career — 1605 115.1 — — — — +29 -18 +24 39.3% -0.82 16–29 (36%) 10–15 (40%) 92.1 +4.76 — 1542 103.4 — — — — +31 — — 44.4% -0.20 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +6.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.