H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Na Li H2H: 0-2

Na Li holds a 2–0 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Miami Open round of 16 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 38 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #2 6-0 6-2 Carla Suárez Navarro #17 Match data Mar 21, 2014* R16 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #28 5-7 6-1 7-5 Carla Suárez Navarro #23 Match data May 11, 2009 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,031 343 253 57.6% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2008 13–12 52.0% #49 1,556 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2012 24–25 49.0% #34 1,685 0 0 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,811 0 0 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,829 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,792 0 1 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2016 37–21 63.8% #12 1,804 0 2 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,747 0 2 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2018 27–20 57.4% #23 1,812 0 2 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,740 0 2 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,716 0 2 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 2021 1–4 20.0% #342 1,706 0 2 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2013 17 16 33 51.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2014 30 17 47 63.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2015 27 18 45 60.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 23 14 37 62.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2017 11 13 24 45.8% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2018 21 13 34 61.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 182 156 338 53.8% 131 69 200 65.5% 27 25 52 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 519/597 of Carla Suárez Navarro's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2008 10/25 1.1 2.4 67.8% 60.0% 45.9% 46.1% 56.5% 55.3% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 44/54 0.6 2.3 68.3% 58.3% 43.5% 48.8% 57.2% 53.5% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 32/35 0.5 2.6 69.2% 60.2% 45.3% 57.5% 52.8% 55.6% 48.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 23/27 0.6 2.7 66.8% 58.5% 43.8% 46.3% 51.3% 53.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 44/49 0.7 2.8 61.3% 57.8% 45.9% 47.7% 47.8% 53.5% 46.8% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2013 61/67 0.7 1.8 68.3% 59.6% 44.8% 49.5% 45.2% 54.8% 46.3% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2014 66/75 0.8 1.8 71.5% 61.3% 48.8% 59.3% 55.0% 57.6% 47.4% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2015 53/66 1.1 2.2 68.4% 59.9% 49.2% 52.3% 44.1% 56.5% 43.7% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2016 53/59 1.5 2.2 67.9% 65.0% 48.9% 55.9% 46.3% 59.6% 46.1% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2017 49/49 1.0 1.3 69.0% 61.2% 46.6% 51.4% 50.3% 56.7% 47.3% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2018 42/47 1.4 1.6 63.9% 63.3% 48.7% 48.5% 44.2% 57.8% 42.7% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2019 34/34 1.3 1.7 64.4% 61.0% 44.3% 53.0% 50.2% 54.9% 44.9% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2020 5/5 0.4 0.8 67.5% 62.6% 39.7% 54.8% 49.0% 54.7% 42.0% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 2021 3/5 0.7 2.7 62.4% 55.1% 59.1% 31.7% 39.8% 56.1% 29.8% 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 519/597 0.9 2.0 67.5% 60.7% 46.7% 52.0% 49.4% 56.0% 45.8% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2008 1556 116.3 +0.04 -0.08 0.990 49.7% -80 +117 — 54.7% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 +0.94 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2009 1648 129.9 -1.19 +1.22 0.973 49.5% -65 +60 +12 53.2% +0.02 10–8 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.7 +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1696 132.9 -0.35 +4.10 1.091 51.9% -34 +34 — 56.1% +0.49 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 1683 118.9 -1.15 +1.17 0.992 49.9% -34 +61 — 57.1% +0.23 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 +1.59 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2012 1685 129.6 -1.52 +2.21 1.006 50.0% -29 +66 -60 48.0% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -1.48 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2013 1812 143.2 -0.34 +2.87 1.025 50.5% -61 +74 -102 58.9% +0.40 10–7 (59%) 7–3 (70%) 105.3 -0.62 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2014 1829 148.3 +1.78 +3.55 1.120 52.6% -6 +106 -121 64.0% +0.85 13–9 (59%) 11–5 (69%) 105.5 +1.61 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2015 1793 149.4 -0.63 +3.13 1.005 49.9% +26 +174 -122 55.3% +0.19 19–7 (73%) 11–4 (73%) 110.8 -1.27 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2016 1804 145.7 +3.33 +2.65 1.140 52.6% +4 +149 -65 59.6% +0.74 15–9 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.4 +1.43 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2017 1748 140.2 +0.64 +3.29 1.091 51.9% -5 +164 -30 52.8% +0.53 5–7 (42%) 2–8 (20%) 90.1 -1.34 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2018 1813 142.4 +1.11 +0.48 1.013 50.2% +26 +26 -114 50.0% -0.15 10–4 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 107.3 +0.39 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2019 1741 136.0 -1.30 +1.97 0.995 49.8% +15 +75 -3 50.0% -0.04 4–6 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 96.4 +1.09 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2020 1716 126.2 +1.52 +0.87 0.929 48.4% +14 — — 50.0% -0.50 0–2 2–0 — -0.54 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 2021 1706 123.3 +1.01 +0.12 0.680 43.7% +26 — — 38.5% -1.15 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.3 -0.97 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 2031 144.8 +0.25 +2.46 1.041 50.8% -12 +94 -70 55.5% +0.30 107–78 (58%) 66–48 (58%) 107.8 +0.19 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.