H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 3-2

Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 3–2 lead over Svetlana Kuznetsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2017 Cincinnati fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 18, 2017* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R16 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 6-2 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #32 Match data
Jun 19, 2015* Birmingham WTA 500 R16 Grass Carla Suárez Navarro #9 6-3 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #27 Match data
May 4, 2014* Oeiras WTA 250 F Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #15 6-4 3-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #29 Match data
Jan 20, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #75 6-2 4-6 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #33 Match data
Mar 10, 2010* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #42 6-4 4-6 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 — — — — — — — 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 — — — — — — — 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 — — — — — — — 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18