H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 4-3

Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 4–3 lead over Timea Bacsinszky in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Timea Bacsinszky leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2016 Rome fourth round 5-7 7-5 6-2.

ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
SUI Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2016* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Timea Bacsinszky #10 5-7 7-5 6-2 Carla Suárez Navarro #11 Match data
Feb 25, 2016* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #11 6-2 6-2 Timea Bacsinszky #15 Match data
Oct 9, 2015* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Timea Bacsinszky #17 6-4 4-6 7-5 Carla Suárez Navarro #12 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #15 7-5 1-6 6-4 Timea Bacsinszky #112 Match data
Oct 3, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #46 6-4 6-1 Timea Bacsinszky #218 Match data
Jul 18, 2009* Prague WTA 250 QF Clay Timea Bacsinszky #102 6-4 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #33 Match data
Aug 22, 2008* Forest Hills WTA 250 R16 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #52 6-4 7-6(5) Timea Bacsinszky #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,933 161 137 54.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Timea Bacsinszky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0
17 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0
18 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2008 13–15 46.4% #54 1,592 0 0
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,693 0 1
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,662 0 1
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,602 0 1
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,596 0 1
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,842 0 3
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2016 32–17 65.3% #15 1,777 0 4
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,816 0 4
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,725 0 4
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2019 4–9 30.8% #139 1,630 0 4
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2